Accessibility Tools

Sélectionnez votre langue

Sur le terrain

Explorez notre travail avec des partenaires, à l'échelle mondiale, pour lutter contre l'injustice sociale et économique sous l’angle des droits de l'Homme.

Un organe de l'ONU préoccupé par la fermeture d’écoles publiques

Un organe de l'ONU préoccupé par la fermeture d’écoles publiques

Nouveau Rapport - Un organe de l'ONU préoccupé par la fermeture d’écoles publiques et la marchandisation de l'éducation en Mauritanie

 

Nouakchott, 14 décembre 2018. La société civile mauritanienne a lancé publiquement hier le rapport sur la privatisation et la marchandisation de l'éducation en Mauritanie. Le Comité des Droits de l'Enfant des Nations Unies, dans ses recommandations finales sur la Mauritanie, a exprimé sa profonde préoccupation face à ‘la fermeture récente sans remplacement apparent de six écoles publiques à Nouakchott, le taux élevé d'analphabétisme, la faible disponibilité de l'éducation préscolaire et primaire, et la prolifération des écoles privées qui rendent l’enseignement de qualité à un coût prohibitif pour les enfants vivants dans des situations défavorisées ou vulnérables’.

La Mauritanie a autorisé en 2016 la fermeture de six écoles publiques dans le centre de la capitale, Nouakchott. Cela a conduit à la déscolarisation permanente d'un nombre estimé à des milliers d'enfants. L’État n’a pas été en mesure de préciser pourquoi de telles mesures ont été prises ou si des mesures de précaution ont été adoptées pour éviter la perte de l’accès à l’éducation de ces enfants.

Les membres du CDE ont également exprimé de sérieuses préoccupations concernant l'insuffisance de la surveillance des écoles privées et coraniques, ainsi que la mauvaise qualité de l'enseignement dans le système scolaire public.

Un groupe d'organisations formé par l'Association des Femmes Chefs de Famille (AFCF), la Coalition des organisations mauritaniennes pour l'éducation (COMEDUC) et de l'Initiative mondiale pour les droits économiques, sociaux et culturels (GI-ESCR) a soulevé nombre de ces problèmes, à la suite d'un projet de recherche d'un an sur les effets de la marchandisation croissante de l'éducation en Mauritanie sur les droits de l'Homme.

Les recherches ont révélé une croissance spectaculaire de l'enseignement privé en Mauritanie au cours des 16 dernières années, le nombre d'élèves dans les écoles privées ayant été multiplié par huit au cours de cette période, sans cadre réglementaire et de suivi approprié. Ceci a eu des effets négatifs sur le droit à l'éducation en accentuant les inégalités et la discrimination, en limitant l'accès à une éducation gratuite et de qualité et la protection de l'éducation en tant que droit non commercial.

Selon Sidi Boudide, président de la Coalition des Organisations Mauritaniennes pour l'Education (COMEDUC), ce n'est pas seulement la réalisation du droit à l'éducation des enfants qui est entravée, mais aussi ‘la vente du patrimoine éducatif mauritanien, avec la fermeture, pour le compte du gouvernement, des écoles historiques de Nouakchott ayant formé plusieurs générations de mauritaniens, y compris des responsables gouvernementaux.'

Le Comité a recommandé à la Mauritanie, entre autres,‘d'élaborer une politique visant à contrôler la qualité des écoles coraniques, en particulier en ce qui concerne leur structure, leur gestion et leurs programmes’ et de ‘réduire les effets discriminatoires de la privatisation et de l'enseignement privé sur les enfants issus de familles financièrement défavorisées et mettre en place des mécanismes permettant de contrôler la conformité des écoles privées avec les normes minimales d’enseignement, les exigences vis-à-vis des programmes, et de la qualification des enseignants.’

Aminettou Mint Moctar, présidente de l’Association des Femmes Chefs de Famille (AFCF), a appelé ‘tous les mauritaniens, tous les membres de la diaspora, à soutenir le plaidoyer pour dénoncer la marchandisation de l’éducation, car leur pays ne peut se développer sans une éducation de qualité. Ils doivent faire preuve de solidarité en dénonçant la vente d'écoles et demander que le contenu de l'école et de l'éducation soient améliorés. Nous appelons donc à la mobilisation de la diaspora mauritanienne pour exiger une éducation saine et respectueuse de l'état de droit et des besoins actuels de la société et de notre développement. Dénonçons main dans la main la commercialisation de l’éducation et la fermeture des écoles publiques.’

FIN

Note : Le Comité des Droits de l’Enfant est responsable du suivi de la mise en œuvre de la Convention Internationale des Droits de l'Enfant. La Mauritanie a ratifié la Convention relative aux droits de l'enfant en 1991. Le Comité a examiné l'application de la Convention par la Mauritanie les 17 et 18 octobre 2018 à Genève dans le cadre d'un processus d'examen périodique.

Privatisation and the sale of public school lands in Mauritania (FR)

Private Actors & Mauritania

Informations sur la privatisation de l’éducation dans l’espace francophone

Contact

  • Aminettou Mint Moctar, Association des Femmes Chefs de Famille (AFCF), Cette adresse e-mail est protégée contre les robots spammeurs. Vous devez activer le JavaScript pour la visualiser.
  • Sidi Boudide, Coalition des Organisations Mauritaniennes pour l'Education (COMEDUC), +222 46 71 96 29,Cette adresse e-mail est protégée contre les robots spammeurs. Vous devez activer le JavaScript pour la visualiser.
  • Sylvain Aubry, Initiative mondiale pour les droits économiques, sociaux et culturels (GI-ESCR), +254 7 88 28 96 34, + 33 7 81 70 81 96,Cette adresse e-mail est protégée contre les robots spammeurs. Vous devez activer le JavaScript pour la visualiser.

Related Articles

NEWSLETTER

Ne manquez aucune mise à jour!
Image

Sélectionnez votre langue

Social Media:

Log in

Climate and Environmental Justice

We have advanced rights-based and gender-transformative transition frameworks through research that centres the lived experiences of women and marginalised communities on the frontlines of extractive energy policies, promoting climate and energy frameworks attentive to the social and care-related impacts of transition pathways. We have developed a clear vision for a gender-just transition, firmly rooted in gender and human rights norms, establishing both the legal basis and the direction for the transformative changes our planet and societies urgently need. In particular, the ‘Guiding Principles for Gender Equality and Human Rights in the Energy Transition’, a collective effort built through online consultations, an in-person workshop and multiple rounds of revision with activists, practitioners and experts from around the world, outline a transformative vision for reshaping global energy systems through a human rights and gender equality lens.

Our work recognises that the climate emergency is both an existential threat and an opportunity to reimagine societies built on social, gender, economic and environmental justice. We ground our advocacy in feminist and intersectional principles, prioritising the agency and perspectives of communities in the Global South who have contributed the least to the climate emergency yet face its most devastating consequences. Central to our approach is the understanding that energy is not merely a commodity but a fundamental human right; essential for dignity, health, education, work and the realisation of countless other rights. We challenge approaches to the energy transition that risk replicating the harmful patterns of fossil fuel extraction and, instead, advocate for transformative policies that ensure human rights and gender equality as central to building climate-resilient societies rooted in dignity, justice and planetary well-being.

What's next?

We will continue to challenge approaches that treat energy transition as merely a technical shift, instead positioning it as an opportunity to reimagine economies and societies rooted in dignity for all, with particular attention to communities in the Global South who have contributed least to the climate emergency yet are most exposed to its worst effects.

We will connect community-level evidence and the lived experiences of those on the frontlines of extractive policies to national reform and global norm-setting, breaking down silos between human rights, gender, and climate movements, and advancing a shared vision that recognises just transitions as not only fundamental to achieving climate-resilient and sustainable societies, but as transformative pathways that advance social and gender equality, redistribute power and resources equitably, and ensure that energy systems serve the public good rather than profit.

We will mainstream rights-based and genderjust transition priorities in key multilateral spaces (particularly, within the Just Transition Work Programme and the to-be-developed Just Transition Mechanism, within the UNFCCC) to guarantee that just transitions are advanced at all levels.

We will also translate our work, through strategic advocacy, into at least two concrete policy wins, whether promoted, adopted, implemented, or scaled, in priority countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Colombia, South Africa, or Kenya), ensuring these policies align with human rights standards, centre gender equality, and reflect the needs and views of affected communities.

We will build momentum for the progressive recognition of the right to sustainable energy to shift dominant narratives away from purely extractive solutions that sideline gendered impacts, community participation, and Global South perspectives.

Economic Justice and Climate Finance

Our work has transformed the global discussion on fiscal policy in a more just, emancipatory and sustainable direction. Our approach has combined both high-level, expert contributions within decisionmaking circles, with bold, impactful work on narrative change with the general public.

We have been instrumental in the inclusion of human rights as a guiding principle of the future United Nations Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, a multilateral instrument with the potential of raising approx. USD 492 billion per year in public revenues currently foregone to global tax abuse. In the process leading to the ‘Compromiso de Sevilla’ decided at FfD4, we proposed and succeeded in creating a specific human rights workstream within the Civil Society Financing for Development Mechanism, which was critical to ensure that explicit commitments on the matter were included in the negotiating outcome. In a context of cutbacks in multilateral institutions, we have amplified the capacities of technical experts, providing rigorous technical support and leveraging our influence to ensure the enactments of groundbreaking standard-setting instruments, such as the 2025 UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Statement on Fiscal Policy and Human Rights, and the first ex oficio hearing on the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights on Fiscal and Economic Policies to Address Poverty and Structural Inequality, leading to an upcoming thematic resolution on the matter. We have also bridged the silos between multilateral tax discussions and climate finance debates, promoting ambitious financing commitments to increase international and domestic resource mobilisation during COP 28, 29 and 30.

At the regional level, our engagement with fiscal cooperation platforms such as the Platform for Fiscal Cooperation of Latin America and the Caribbean (PTLAC), where we are member of its Civil Society Consultative Council, and the African Anti-IFFs Policy Tracker, for which we participated in the pilot mission in Ivory Coast together with Tax Justice Network Africa (TJNA), have been critical in cementing a growing engagement between tax administrations and ministries of finance with international legal experts, exploring actionable and transformative initiatives, such as the taxation of high-net-worth individuals, beneficial ownership registries and corporate countryby-country reports, to be implemented at the international level.

At the local level, our interventions in fiscal reform debates in Chile, Brazil, Colombia and Nigeria have contributed to shaping legislative outcomes in a more progressive, rights-compliant direction.

As for our leadership in narrative change, we have a measurable track record in delivering tailored, innovative campaigns which have decisively expanded economic justice constituencies by appealing to a broader tent. In Latin America and the Caribbean, we created the ‘Date Cuenta’ campaign, coordinating over 40 organisations across civil society to deliver plain language, innovative messaging connecting progressive fiscal reforms to the financing of health, education and social protection. ‘Date Cuenta’ generated over 55 original campaign messages that were tailored to the realities of seven priority countries (Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru and Honduras) and disseminated in Spanish, Portuguese and English. In doing so, we convened more than 65 online co-creation workshops with partners, coordinating a unified communications strategy which combined digital outreach, press and media coverage, and collaboration with influencers. Ultimately, ‘Date Cuenta’ resulted in more than 60,000 interactions on social media, coverage in major regional and international media outlets, including El País, Deutsche Welle, Bloomberg and France 24, and the participation of at least 63 social media influencers through 58 dedicated publications. In collaboration with Fundación Gabo and the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, we also organised a two-day workshop in Bogota with 20 journalists from 13 countries, building a regional network trained in a human rights-based approach to fiscal policy that has since generated published media coverage on outlets such as La Diaria, Ciper, El Diario Ar and Milenio. Through ‘Date Cuenta’ and our regional advocacy, we strengthened civil society engagement in key processes, including the Financing for Development track and FfD4, co-organised highlevel dialogues with states and civil society from Latin America and Africa.

What's next?

We will shape the UN Tax Convention and its Protocols so they embed human rights principles, and we will stay engaged through follow-up processes (including the expected Conference of the Parties) to support effective implementation. We will keep linking tax and climate finance so that new resources mobilised through fiscal cooperation are channelled to adaptation, mitigation, and loss and damage, in line with UNFCCC commitments.

Public Services for Care Societies

We have translated participatory research into accountability and policy outcomes.

In Ivory Coast, our work with Mouvement Ivoirien des Droits Humains and affected communities since 2023 exposed how privatisation and lack of accountability restrict access to quality healthcare. It contributed to the closure of 1,022 illegal private health centres, an executive instrument strengthening the regulation of private hospitals across the country, and the creation of a permanent complaints management committee in healthcare through a bylaw issued by the prefect of Gagnoa. Partners engaged through this process also advanced concrete improvements at facility level: members of the Gagnoa Midwives Association who took part in the participatory action research pooled resources to renovate the neonatal unit of the Regional Hospital, and the Director of the Gagnoa General Hospital launched an action plan to expand services and improve patient reception, with the facility receiving the award for best hospital in the country in 2025.

In Kenya, our research with the Mathare Education Taskforce documented the absence of public schools and the expansion of private provision, evidencing impacts on households and caregivers and strengthening demands for free, quality public education. This work contributed to stronger community agency and collective organisation, alongside ongoing strategies ranging from communications to litigation to secure a public school in the area, some involving GI-ESCR and others led independently.

Across Africa, this work is complemented by a multi-country study examining the human rights implications of austerity in education and health, including how regressive fiscal policies, rising debt burdens and persistent underinvestment undermine the financing and delivery of public services.

In Latin America, from 29 November to 2 December 2021, over a thousand representatives from over one hundred countries, from grassroots movements, advocacy, human rights, and development organisations, feminist movements, trade unions, and other civil society organisations, met in Santiago, Chile, and virtually, to discuss the critical role of public services for our future. Following the meeting, the Santiago Declaration on Public Services was adopted to demand universal access to quality, gender-transformative and equitable public services as the foundation of a fair and just society.

We are currently advancing work on care systems, linking public services and fiscal justice through integrated research, advocacy and communications, including a regional campaign framing care as a collective responsibility requiring sustained public investment.

What's next?

In Ivory Coast, we will evaluate and strengthen the complaints management committee and position it as a replicable model for other health facilities. In Kenya, we will support the Mathare community to co-design a model public school for Mabatini and Ngei wards, grounded in human rights standards. Building on our multi-country austerity study, we will drive national advocacy on financing for education and health: advancing reforms in Ghana; launching a fiscal policy and public services financing agenda in Kenya through the CESCR process and targeted coalition work; and, in Nigeria, using the new tax acts in force since 1 January 2026 to catalyse a national accountability campaign for adequately funded, quality public services. In Latin America, we will amplify locally led care pilots across 8 countries and turn lessons into influence—advancing care policies that strengthen care organisations, protect care workers’ rights, support unpaid caregivers, include disability and family networks, and redistribute care more equitably.