Accessibility Tools

Web Accessibility plugin by DJ-Extensions.com

On the Ground

Explore our work with partners, globally and locally, to tackle social and economic injustice using a human rights lens.

Marriage and Property Rights

Marriage and Property Rights

Marriage and Property Rights: GI-ESCR and partners build pathways to gender equality in Asia and Africa

 

 

This 22 June 2021, GI-ESCR, the African Commission for Human and People’s Rights (ACHPR), IGED-Africa, the Centre for Human Rights of the University of Pretoria, IWRAW-AP and ESCR-Net convened a workshop on Marriage and Property Rights: Pathways to Gender Equality in Africa and Asia.  The event allowed UN experts, ACHPR’s Commissioners and civil society organisations and activists in Africa and Asia to learn, share visions and strategise on women’s equal rights to property.

GI-ESCR has worked for several years with its partners to place women’s property rights on the agenda of the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights (ACHPR) and to encourage the adoption of specific regional standards on these issues. In 2018 we succeeded in having the ACHPR adopt a resolution affirming its intention to elaborate a General Comment on Article 7(d) of the Maputo Protocol, on 'equitable share' of matrimonial property. This was a goal on which we worked for 7 years until General Comment no.6 was adopted by the ACHPR in 2020. These efforts also allowed to have a strengthened and more coordinated movement to advance women’s rights to land and productive resources at international and regional levels.

This workshop on Marriage and Property Rights: Pathways to Gender Equality in Africa and Asia bulit on this work and focused on strengthening and deepening partnerships between organisations, including women in Africa organising through legal networks, as well as with international organisations active on these issues. Convening more than 40 women’s rights experts, activists, and community members from Africa and Asia to share their insights, challenges and lesson learned advocating for women’s equal property rights, the workshop allowed to:

  • Foster mutual learning from the differences and similarities of the situation of women’s marital property rights in Africa and Asia;

  • Popularise the contribution of the ACHPR in this regard including the development of soft law instruments, such as the General Comment No. 6 on the Maputo Protocol and encourage civil society organizations to make effective use of General Comment No. 6 on the Maputo Protocol;

  • Exchange information on effective advocacy strategies and tools to advance women’s right to marital property in Africa and Asia.

As keynote speakers, several international and regional experts from Africa and Asia helped  lead, inform and frame the discussions during the event, including the following UN and ACHPR experts:

  • Honourable Commissioner Teresa Manuela, Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Women in Africa;

  • Honourable Lucy Asuagbor, Former Commissioner and Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Women in Africa (SRRWA) of the ACHPR;

  • Ms Virginia Brás Gomes, Former President of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights;

  • Honourable Commissioner Soyata Maiga, Former Vice President and Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Women in Africa (SRRWA) of the ACHPR;

  • Ms Aruna Devi Narain, Member of the UN Committee on the Elimination of the Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW Committee); and

  • Ms Prof Savitri Goonesekere, Former member of the CEDAW Committee.

Background

In African and Asian societies, women are often seen as dependent on male family members considering male authority as the key and unchallenged decision-maker power in the household. The family domain is, therefore, often a space in which gender inequality is accentuated, significantly affecting the conditions for women’s enjoyment of their full range of rights. Despite considerable progress made in recent years in the development of gender equality and anti-discrimination laws at the regional level, many women in Africa and Asia remain unable to exercise their rights for a myriad of reasons related to the persistent gaps in legal protection, pervasive social and religious practices that reinforce negative gender roles, and the lack of State institutional capacity and resources, all factors which create a wide disconnection between rights and reality.

One of the key areas of concern at the family level are discriminatory marital property arrangements. In this terrain, unequal power relations between women and men are commonly reflected in women’s lack of access to an equal share of the property derived from marriage. As a result, women are all too often more susceptible to poverty and dispossession and their agency and possibility to decide upon their own future is severely compromised. Secure and equal marriage and property rights are thus directly related with women’s enjoyment of other fundamental rights, such as the rights to education, to work, to an adequate standard of living, as well as to be free from gender-based violence.

This comparative analysis between the regions of Africa and Asia in relation to matrimonial property assisted civil society organizations in the development of advocacy tools and strategies, share lessons learned and identify ways forward to combat structural conditions of discrimination against women in and out of marriage.

The workshop was also a fantastic opportunity to present and disseminate the content of the General Comment No. 6 on the Maputo Protocol that was recently adopted by the ACHPR, as well as for civil society organizations to share their experiences using this key refrence legal tool in local and regional advocacy strategies.  

Learn more about General Comment No. 6 here!

Stay tunned for the outcomes report of the event in which we will share the key takeaways of the event!

You don't have a pdf plugin, but you can download the pdf file.

 

You don't have a pdf plugin, but you can download the pdf file.

 

Related Articles

Feminist Economists Debate How Global Tax Rules Impact Care, Rights and Climate Justice

Feminist Economists Debate How Global Tax Rules Impact Care, Rights and Climate Justice

Martín Pintus
New Tools to Advance Care: From Evidence to Public Action

New Tools to Advance Care: From Evidence to Public Action

Martín Pintus
Contribution to the Women and Gender Constituency Submission on the Operationalisation of the Belém Antalya Mechanism (BAM)

Contribution to the Women and Gender Constituency Submission on the Operationalisation of the Belém Antalya Mechanism (BAM)

Macarena Cano Muñoz

SITEMAP

TAKE ACTION

NEWSLETTER

Don´t miss any updates!
SUBSCRIBE
Image

Social Media:

Log in

Climate and Environmental Justice

We have advanced rights-based and gender-transformative transition frameworks through research that centres the lived experiences of women and marginalised communities on the frontlines of extractive energy policies, promoting climate and energy frameworks attentive to the social and care-related impacts of transition pathways. We have developed a clear vision for a gender-just transition, firmly rooted in gender and human rights norms, establishing both the legal basis and the direction for the transformative changes our planet and societies urgently need. In particular, the ‘Guiding Principles for Gender Equality and Human Rights in the Energy Transition’, a collective effort built through online consultations, an in-person workshop and multiple rounds of revision with activists, practitioners and experts from around the world, outline a transformative vision for reshaping global energy systems through a human rights and gender equality lens.

Our work recognises that the climate emergency is both an existential threat and an opportunity to reimagine societies built on social, gender, economic and environmental justice. We ground our advocacy in feminist and intersectional principles, prioritising the agency and perspectives of communities in the Global South who have contributed the least to the climate emergency yet face its most devastating consequences. Central to our approach is the understanding that energy is not merely a commodity but a fundamental human right; essential for dignity, health, education, work and the realisation of countless other rights. We challenge approaches to the energy transition that risk replicating the harmful patterns of fossil fuel extraction and, instead, advocate for transformative policies that ensure human rights and gender equality as central to building climate-resilient societies rooted in dignity, justice and planetary well-being.

What's next?

We will continue to challenge approaches that treat energy transition as merely a technical shift, instead positioning it as an opportunity to reimagine economies and societies rooted in dignity for all, with particular attention to communities in the Global South who have contributed least to the climate emergency yet are most exposed to its worst effects.

We will connect community-level evidence and the lived experiences of those on the frontlines of extractive policies to national reform and global norm-setting, breaking down silos between human rights, gender, and climate movements, and advancing a shared vision that recognises just transitions as not only fundamental to achieving climate-resilient and sustainable societies, but as transformative pathways that advance social and gender equality, redistribute power and resources equitably, and ensure that energy systems serve the public good rather than profit.

We will mainstream rights-based and genderjust transition priorities in key multilateral spaces (particularly, within the Just Transition Work Programme and the to-be-developed Just Transition Mechanism, within the UNFCCC) to guarantee that just transitions are advanced at all levels.

We will also translate our work, through strategic advocacy, into at least two concrete policy wins, whether promoted, adopted, implemented, or scaled, in priority countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Colombia, South Africa, or Kenya), ensuring these policies align with human rights standards, centre gender equality, and reflect the needs and views of affected communities.

We will build momentum for the progressive recognition of the right to sustainable energy to shift dominant narratives away from purely extractive solutions that sideline gendered impacts, community participation, and Global South perspectives.

Economic Justice and Climate Finance

Our work has transformed the global discussion on fiscal policy in a more just, emancipatory and sustainable direction. Our approach has combined both high-level, expert contributions within decisionmaking circles, with bold, impactful work on narrative change with the general public.

We have been instrumental in the inclusion of human rights as a guiding principle of the future United Nations Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, a multilateral instrument with the potential of raising approx. USD 492 billion per year in public revenues currently foregone to global tax abuse. In the process leading to the ‘Compromiso de Sevilla’ decided at FfD4, we proposed and succeeded in creating a specific human rights workstream within the Civil Society Financing for Development Mechanism, which was critical to ensure that explicit commitments on the matter were included in the negotiating outcome. In a context of cutbacks in multilateral institutions, we have amplified the capacities of technical experts, providing rigorous technical support and leveraging our influence to ensure the enactments of groundbreaking standard-setting instruments, such as the 2025 UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Statement on Fiscal Policy and Human Rights, and the first ex oficio hearing on the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights on Fiscal and Economic Policies to Address Poverty and Structural Inequality, leading to an upcoming thematic resolution on the matter. We have also bridged the silos between multilateral tax discussions and climate finance debates, promoting ambitious financing commitments to increase international and domestic resource mobilisation during COP 28, 29 and 30.

At the regional level, our engagement with fiscal cooperation platforms such as the Platform for Fiscal Cooperation of Latin America and the Caribbean (PTLAC), where we are member of its Civil Society Consultative Council, and the African Anti-IFFs Policy Tracker, for which we participated in the pilot mission in Ivory Coast together with Tax Justice Network Africa (TJNA), have been critical in cementing a growing engagement between tax administrations and ministries of finance with international legal experts, exploring actionable and transformative initiatives, such as the taxation of high-net-worth individuals, beneficial ownership registries and corporate countryby-country reports, to be implemented at the international level.

At the local level, our interventions in fiscal reform debates in Chile, Brazil, Colombia and Nigeria have contributed to shaping legislative outcomes in a more progressive, rights-compliant direction.

As for our leadership in narrative change, we have a measurable track record in delivering tailored, innovative campaigns which have decisively expanded economic justice constituencies by appealing to a broader tent. In Latin America and the Caribbean, we created the ‘Date Cuenta’ campaign, coordinating over 40 organisations across civil society to deliver plain language, innovative messaging connecting progressive fiscal reforms to the financing of health, education and social protection. ‘Date Cuenta’ generated over 55 original campaign messages that were tailored to the realities of seven priority countries (Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru and Honduras) and disseminated in Spanish, Portuguese and English. In doing so, we convened more than 65 online co-creation workshops with partners, coordinating a unified communications strategy which combined digital outreach, press and media coverage, and collaboration with influencers. Ultimately, ‘Date Cuenta’ resulted in more than 60,000 interactions on social media, coverage in major regional and international media outlets, including El País, Deutsche Welle, Bloomberg and France 24, and the participation of at least 63 social media influencers through 58 dedicated publications. In collaboration with Fundación Gabo and the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, we also organised a two-day workshop in Bogota with 20 journalists from 13 countries, building a regional network trained in a human rights-based approach to fiscal policy that has since generated published media coverage on outlets such as La Diaria, Ciper, El Diario Ar and Milenio. Through ‘Date Cuenta’ and our regional advocacy, we strengthened civil society engagement in key processes, including the Financing for Development track and FfD4, co-organised highlevel dialogues with states and civil society from Latin America and Africa.

What's next?

We will shape the UN Tax Convention and its Protocols so they embed human rights principles, and we will stay engaged through follow-up processes (including the expected Conference of the Parties) to support effective implementation. We will keep linking tax and climate finance so that new resources mobilised through fiscal cooperation are channelled to adaptation, mitigation, and loss and damage, in line with UNFCCC commitments.

Public Services for Care Societies

We have translated participatory research into accountability and policy outcomes.

In Ivory Coast, our work with Mouvement Ivoirien des Droits Humains and affected communities since 2023 exposed how privatisation and lack of accountability restrict access to quality healthcare. It contributed to the closure of 1,022 illegal private health centres, an executive instrument strengthening the regulation of private hospitals across the country, and the creation of a permanent complaints management committee in healthcare through a bylaw issued by the prefect of Gagnoa. Partners engaged through this process also advanced concrete improvements at facility level: members of the Gagnoa Midwives Association who took part in the participatory action research pooled resources to renovate the neonatal unit of the Regional Hospital, and the Director of the Gagnoa General Hospital launched an action plan to expand services and improve patient reception, with the facility receiving the award for best hospital in the country in 2025.

In Kenya, our research with the Mathare Education Taskforce documented the absence of public schools and the expansion of private provision, evidencing impacts on households and caregivers and strengthening demands for free, quality public education. This work contributed to stronger community agency and collective organisation, alongside ongoing strategies ranging from communications to litigation to secure a public school in the area, some involving GI-ESCR and others led independently.

Across Africa, this work is complemented by a multi-country study examining the human rights implications of austerity in education and health, including how regressive fiscal policies, rising debt burdens and persistent underinvestment undermine the financing and delivery of public services.

In Latin America, from 29 November to 2 December 2021, over a thousand representatives from over one hundred countries, from grassroots movements, advocacy, human rights, and development organisations, feminist movements, trade unions, and other civil society organisations, met in Santiago, Chile, and virtually, to discuss the critical role of public services for our future. Following the meeting, the Santiago Declaration on Public Services was adopted to demand universal access to quality, gender-transformative and equitable public services as the foundation of a fair and just society.

We are currently advancing work on care systems, linking public services and fiscal justice through integrated research, advocacy and communications, including a regional campaign framing care as a collective responsibility requiring sustained public investment.

What's next?

In Ivory Coast, we will evaluate and strengthen the complaints management committee and position it as a replicable model for other health facilities. In Kenya, we will support the Mathare community to co-design a model public school for Mabatini and Ngei wards, grounded in human rights standards. Building on our multi-country austerity study, we will drive national advocacy on financing for education and health: advancing reforms in Ghana; launching a fiscal policy and public services financing agenda in Kenya through the CESCR process and targeted coalition work; and, in Nigeria, using the new tax acts in force since 1 January 2026 to catalyse a national accountability campaign for adequately funded, quality public services. In Latin America, we will amplify locally led care pilots across 8 countries and turn lessons into influence—advancing care policies that strengthen care organisations, protect care workers’ rights, support unpaid caregivers, include disability and family networks, and redistribute care more equitably.