Accessibility Tools

Select your language

The Energy Transition Leaves Women Out in the Cold: The Gendered Face of Energy Policy

The Energy Transition Leaves Women Out in the Cold: The Gendered Face of Energy Policy

By Dr. Mariëlle Feenstra, scientific director 75inQ

Women are sidelined in the energy transition policies: it is essential to have policy awareness of gender inequality and an acknowledgement of societal diversity to foster a fair energy transition. In this essay, the international, European and Dutch policy narrative around just energy transitions is commented on from a gender perspective.

The energy transition policies neglect the interests of women: a policy awareness of gender inequality and acknowledgement of societal diversity are pivotal in shaping a fair energy transition. The ongoing energy transition provides an excellent opportunity to advocate for a systemic change rooted in the vision of a vibrant, just, and egalitarian society, as acknowledged by the European Union in the European Green Deal. However, I argue that achieving a just energy transition demands a reimagined governmental role, characterized by a more mission- and guidance-oriented approach towards social justice. This new role is no small feat, requiring not only an understanding of the technical, economic, and social intricacies of the energy transition but also a consideration of societal diversity. In this essay, I argue that policy sensitivity to gender inequality and diversity in general is indispensable for ensuring and shaping a fair energy transition.

While there is a growing policy focus on energy poverty in Europe and globally embedded in the United Nations Sustainable Energy for All programme current policies predominantly centre around the sustainability, affordability, and energy efficiency of housing. When analysing the National Energy Climate Plans (NECP), the European Member States highlight in the obligatory energy poverty sections that the current energy poverty crisis stems more from an insulation issue rather than an affordability one. Yet, while retrofitting and insulation support help to alleviate energy poverty, it falls short of addressing the systemic social inequality that places large segments of the population in vulnerable positions.

Taking a closer look at the specific groups disproportionately affected by the current energy crisis in Europe, it becomes evident that women in particular, are being marginalized. With persistent income disparities between men and women, a disproportionately high caregiving burden for (single) women, and a higher concentration of female tenants in social housing, energy poverty emerges as a problem that disproportionately impacts women.

The economic hurdle in the transition to sustainable energy: spanning from corporate boardrooms to household living rooms.

As a society, we had barely overcome the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic when an unprecedented energy crisis hit. The unpredictable and global nature of this crisis places significant demands on the resilience and adaptability of our society. However, within every community, there are individuals who lack the capacity to respond resiliently to crises on such a massive scale. Particularly, the most vulnerable members often possess a much lower ability to absorb the shocks of a crisis.

In this unpredictable scenario, governments, businesses, and civil society organizations are actively engaged in the energy transition. However, the energy transition is not solely a technological endeavour, as evidenced by the challenges in insulating existing housing stock. The overrepresentation of women in energy poverty not only calls for increased attention to gender disparities in the energy transition but also demands an understanding of how policy can effectively address social inequality within our society.

For several years, researchers have observed significant disparities in the participation of different societal groups in the energy transition. Currently, those with the financial means to invest in energy-efficient housing tend to enjoy lower energy costs. On the other hand, residents who are unable or prohibited (such as tenants) from making such investments face higher energy bills. Disparities in income, housing quality, responsibilities for dependent family members (children and/or informal care), specific energy dependence (due to factors like diet, physical and mental disability, business activities, mobility), and financial opportunities to invest in energy efficiency contribute to a widening gap between those participating in the energy transition and those left behind.

This gap has a pronounced gender component. In the Netherlands, approximately 700,000 women over the age of 25 lack sufficient income to meet their daily needs. Seventy-two percent of low-income single women serve as the primary breadwinners for their families. One in five households with low energy efficiency in the Netherlands is a single-parent family (on average, one in twenty families in the Netherlands is a single-parent family). Struggling with insufficient income, they bear both the caregiving task and the associated costs, with insulation of an energy-inefficient house being just one of the many financial burdens on this group.

A just energy transition aligns with the principle of solidarity, where those with more resources shoulder heavier burdens to compensate for those who have less investment capacity. The current inadequacy in reflecting the diversity of society in energy policy hinders the successful implementation of the energy transition, which requires broad commitment and social support.

The success of the transition depends on a strong human capital agenda, as stipulated in several NECPs of the European member states. However, an examination of the workforce in sectors actively contributing to the energy transition reveals a predominantly male presence. In the Dutch energy transition, only 22% of the workforce is comprised of women, a figure significantly trailing behind the European average. Consequently, a mere 4% of women hold decision-making positions among these active participants in the energy transition.

Traditionally, women have been underrepresented in this sector, despite the diverse insights and skills required for the energy transition. The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) projects a global increase in jobs in the sustainable energy sector from 10.3 million in 2017 to nearly 29 million in 2050. Essentially, the energy sector is expanding alongside the energy transition, highlighting the untapped labour potential of women to meet the rising demand for a highly skilled workforce. Encouraging lateral entry from other sectors can also be part of the solution, provided that these entrants (regardless of gender) receive support through employment conditions and programs combining work and study.

A frequently cited reason for gender inequality in the energy sector is its historical emphasis on technical aspects. The proportion of women with technical education in the Europe has persistently remained low for decades. However, the sector is grappling with a growing labour shortage and challenges in filling numerous vacancies. Importantly, the challenges in the energy transition extend beyond technical aspects to encompass social, legal, societal, political, and spatial dimensions.

Furthermore, the energy transition unfolds within the homes of end users, with a significant focus on energy consumption behaviour in households. The first-hand experiences of energy consumers (regardless of gender) could offer valuable insights for the energy sector, which needs to adopt a more demand-driven approach to engage end-users in the energy transition. A more diverse workforce in the energy sector can contribute to interventions that are more attuned to the diverse energy needs in society and better resonate with a demand-driven energy transition.

Embracing Social Responsibility: From Household Dynamics to Corporate Governance

Amidst the current surge in energy prices, the social dimension of the energy transition comes to the forefront. This underscores the importance of considering all energy consumers, especially when crafting interventions to prompt changes in energy consumption behaviour.

Research indicates that a gender-focused approach is crucial in intervention programs, given that energy-saving practices impact the timing and nature of household tasks. There is a risk of exacerbating the already disproportionate workload for women, who, on average, dedicate 4.5 hours daily to unpaid domestic work (compared to 2.5 hours for men). Simultaneously, the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) finds that women exhibit more sustainable consumer behaviour than men. They place a higher value on products with eco-labels and sustainability, and they are more willing to adapt their energy consumption behaviour toward sustainable alternatives.

In conclusion, I argue that decision-making in the energy transition, as well as the design and implementation of effective interventions, necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the technical, economic, and social challenges involved. Achieving a reflection of societal diversity in energy transition interventions requires increased diversity in the boardrooms of the energy sector—diversity in people, language, and data. Despite women constituting at least 50% of energy consumers in households, the meagre female representation in the energy sector's boardrooms invites a broader perspective. Recognizing that diversity enhances decision-making processes, it is socially imperative to ensure concerted efforts in establishing and maintaining a diverse and inclusive governance culture in the energy transition. Energy poverty carries a distinct gender dimension, and an affordable and sustainable energy transition for everyone lays the groundwork for the vision of a vibrant, just, and equal society.

 

Mariëlle Feenstra

Dr. Mariëlle Feenstra is co-founder and scientific director of 75inQ, the Institute on gender and energy promoting more visibility for diversity in the energy transition. After 15 years as a policy advisor for municipalities in the Netherlands, she returned to academia with her PhD project “Gender Just Energy Policy: engendering the energy transition in Europe” graduated in 2021 at University Twente, the Netherlands. She has been working on gender and energy since 2000. Her contribution as a gender-energy pioneer has been acknowledged both in academia and in practice by invitations to participate in policy formulation activities for the European Union and the United Nations.

Related Articles

NEWSLETTER

Don´t miss any updates!
Image

Select your language

Social Media:

Log in

Climate and Environmental Justice

We have advanced rights-based and gender-transformative transition frameworks through research that centres the lived experiences of women and marginalised communities on the frontlines of extractive energy policies, promoting climate and energy frameworks attentive to the social and care-related impacts of transition pathways. We have developed a clear vision for a gender-just transition, firmly rooted in gender and human rights norms, establishing both the legal basis and the direction for the transformative changes our planet and societies urgently need. In particular, the ‘Guiding Principles for Gender Equality and Human Rights in the Energy Transition’, a collective effort built through online consultations, an in-person workshop and multiple rounds of revision with activists, practitioners and experts from around the world, outline a transformative vision for reshaping global energy systems through a human rights and gender equality lens.

Our work recognises that the climate emergency is both an existential threat and an opportunity to reimagine societies built on social, gender, economic and environmental justice. We ground our advocacy in feminist and intersectional principles, prioritising the agency and perspectives of communities in the Global South who have contributed the least to the climate emergency yet face its most devastating consequences. Central to our approach is the understanding that energy is not merely a commodity but a fundamental human right; essential for dignity, health, education, work and the realisation of countless other rights. We challenge approaches to the energy transition that risk replicating the harmful patterns of fossil fuel extraction and, instead, advocate for transformative policies that ensure human rights and gender equality as central to building climate-resilient societies rooted in dignity, justice and planetary well-being.

What's next?

We will continue to challenge approaches that treat energy transition as merely a technical shift, instead positioning it as an opportunity to reimagine economies and societies rooted in dignity for all, with particular attention to communities in the Global South who have contributed least to the climate emergency yet are most exposed to its worst effects.

We will connect community-level evidence and the lived experiences of those on the frontlines of extractive policies to national reform and global norm-setting, breaking down silos between human rights, gender, and climate movements, and advancing a shared vision that recognises just transitions as not only fundamental to achieving climate-resilient and sustainable societies, but as transformative pathways that advance social and gender equality, redistribute power and resources equitably, and ensure that energy systems serve the public good rather than profit.

We will mainstream rights-based and genderjust transition priorities in key multilateral spaces (particularly, within the Just Transition Work Programme and the to-be-developed Just Transition Mechanism, within the UNFCCC) to guarantee that just transitions are advanced at all levels.

We will also translate our work, through strategic advocacy, into at least two concrete policy wins, whether promoted, adopted, implemented, or scaled, in priority countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Colombia, South Africa, or Kenya), ensuring these policies align with human rights standards, centre gender equality, and reflect the needs and views of affected communities.

We will build momentum for the progressive recognition of the right to sustainable energy to shift dominant narratives away from purely extractive solutions that sideline gendered impacts, community participation, and Global South perspectives.

Economic Justice and Climate Finance

Our work has transformed the global discussion on fiscal policy in a more just, emancipatory and sustainable direction. Our approach has combined both high-level, expert contributions within decisionmaking circles, with bold, impactful work on narrative change with the general public.

We have been instrumental in the inclusion of human rights as a guiding principle of the future United Nations Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, a multilateral instrument with the potential of raising approx. USD 492 billion per year in public revenues currently foregone to global tax abuse. In the process leading to the ‘Compromiso de Sevilla’ decided at FfD4, we proposed and succeeded in creating a specific human rights workstream within the Civil Society Financing for Development Mechanism, which was critical to ensure that explicit commitments on the matter were included in the negotiating outcome. In a context of cutbacks in multilateral institutions, we have amplified the capacities of technical experts, providing rigorous technical support and leveraging our influence to ensure the enactments of groundbreaking standard-setting instruments, such as the 2025 UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Statement on Fiscal Policy and Human Rights, and the first ex oficio hearing on the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights on Fiscal and Economic Policies to Address Poverty and Structural Inequality, leading to an upcoming thematic resolution on the matter. We have also bridged the silos between multilateral tax discussions and climate finance debates, promoting ambitious financing commitments to increase international and domestic resource mobilisation during COP 28, 29 and 30.

At the regional level, our engagement with fiscal cooperation platforms such as the Platform for Fiscal Cooperation of Latin America and the Caribbean (PTLAC), where we are member of its Civil Society Consultative Council, and the African Anti-IFFs Policy Tracker, for which we participated in the pilot mission in Ivory Coast together with Tax Justice Network Africa (TJNA), have been critical in cementing a growing engagement between tax administrations and ministries of finance with international legal experts, exploring actionable and transformative initiatives, such as the taxation of high-net-worth individuals, beneficial ownership registries and corporate countryby-country reports, to be implemented at the international level.

At the local level, our interventions in fiscal reform debates in Chile, Brazil, Colombia and Nigeria have contributed to shaping legislative outcomes in a more progressive, rights-compliant direction.

As for our leadership in narrative change, we have a measurable track record in delivering tailored, innovative campaigns which have decisively expanded economic justice constituencies by appealing to a broader tent. In Latin America and the Caribbean, we created the ‘Date Cuenta’ campaign, coordinating over 40 organisations across civil society to deliver plain language, innovative messaging connecting progressive fiscal reforms to the financing of health, education and social protection. ‘Date Cuenta’ generated over 55 original campaign messages that were tailored to the realities of seven priority countries (Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru and Honduras) and disseminated in Spanish, Portuguese and English. In doing so, we convened more than 65 online co-creation workshops with partners, coordinating a unified communications strategy which combined digital outreach, press and media coverage, and collaboration with influencers. Ultimately, ‘Date Cuenta’ resulted in more than 60,000 interactions on social media, coverage in major regional and international media outlets, including El País, Deutsche Welle, Bloomberg and France 24, and the participation of at least 63 social media influencers through 58 dedicated publications. In collaboration with Fundación Gabo and the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, we also organised a two-day workshop in Bogota with 20 journalists from 13 countries, building a regional network trained in a human rights-based approach to fiscal policy that has since generated published media coverage on outlets such as La Diaria, Ciper, El Diario Ar and Milenio. Through ‘Date Cuenta’ and our regional advocacy, we strengthened civil society engagement in key processes, including the Financing for Development track and FfD4, co-organised highlevel dialogues with states and civil society from Latin America and Africa.

What's next?

We will shape the UN Tax Convention and its Protocols so they embed human rights principles, and we will stay engaged through follow-up processes (including the expected Conference of the Parties) to support effective implementation. We will keep linking tax and climate finance so that new resources mobilised through fiscal cooperation are channelled to adaptation, mitigation, and loss and damage, in line with UNFCCC commitments.

Public Services for Care Societies

We have translated participatory research into accountability and policy outcomes.

In Ivory Coast, our work with Mouvement Ivoirien des Droits Humains and affected communities since 2023 exposed how privatisation and lack of accountability restrict access to quality healthcare. It contributed to the closure of 1,022 illegal private health centres, an executive instrument strengthening the regulation of private hospitals across the country, and the creation of a permanent complaints management committee in healthcare through a bylaw issued by the prefect of Gagnoa. Partners engaged through this process also advanced concrete improvements at facility level: members of the Gagnoa Midwives Association who took part in the participatory action research pooled resources to renovate the neonatal unit of the Regional Hospital, and the Director of the Gagnoa General Hospital launched an action plan to expand services and improve patient reception, with the facility receiving the award for best hospital in the country in 2025.

In Kenya, our research with the Mathare Education Taskforce documented the absence of public schools and the expansion of private provision, evidencing impacts on households and caregivers and strengthening demands for free, quality public education. This work contributed to stronger community agency and collective organisation, alongside ongoing strategies ranging from communications to litigation to secure a public school in the area, some involving GI-ESCR and others led independently.

Across Africa, this work is complemented by a multi-country study examining the human rights implications of austerity in education and health, including how regressive fiscal policies, rising debt burdens and persistent underinvestment undermine the financing and delivery of public services.

In Latin America, from 29 November to 2 December 2021, over a thousand representatives from over one hundred countries, from grassroots movements, advocacy, human rights, and development organisations, feminist movements, trade unions, and other civil society organisations, met in Santiago, Chile, and virtually, to discuss the critical role of public services for our future. Following the meeting, the Santiago Declaration on Public Services was adopted to demand universal access to quality, gender-transformative and equitable public services as the foundation of a fair and just society.

We are currently advancing work on care systems, linking public services and fiscal justice through integrated research, advocacy and communications, including a regional campaign framing care as a collective responsibility requiring sustained public investment.

What's next?

In Ivory Coast, we will evaluate and strengthen the complaints management committee and position it as a replicable model for other health facilities. In Kenya, we will support the Mathare community to co-design a model public school for Mabatini and Ngei wards, grounded in human rights standards. Building on our multi-country austerity study, we will drive national advocacy on financing for education and health: advancing reforms in Ghana; launching a fiscal policy and public services financing agenda in Kenya through the CESCR process and targeted coalition work; and, in Nigeria, using the new tax acts in force since 1 January 2026 to catalyse a national accountability campaign for adequately funded, quality public services. In Latin America, we will amplify locally led care pilots across 8 countries and turn lessons into influence—advancing care policies that strengthen care organisations, protect care workers’ rights, support unpaid caregivers, include disability and family networks, and redistribute care more equitably.