Accessibility Tools

Select your language

Power to the People: Advancing the Democratization of Energy Transition Through Feminist and Intersectional Perspectives

Power to the People: Advancing the Democratization of the Energy Transition Through Feminist and Intersectional Perspectives

By Marine Cornelis

The energy sector remains the main culprit in climate change, responsible for almost three-quarters of global greenhouse gas emissions. A low-carbon future - known as "decarbonization" - requires interweaving with the other three drivers of the energy transition: decentralization (producing closer to people), digitization (using technology to monitor electricity flows), and democratization.

Democratizing the energy transition puts people at the center. It shows that the path to net-zero encompasses more than technological advances and policy changes. It's about reshaping power dynamics, ensuring equitable access, and recognizing the diversity of needs and contributions. Therefore, in a sector that has historically suffered from a lack of diversity (with women accounting for just 22% of its workforce), democratization requires the recognition of a wider range of possibilities for action, the involvement of stakeholders, and the valuing of diversified experiences and viewpoints. This essay explores the current state of democratization in the energy transition, highlighting challenges and best practices from a feminist and intersectional perspective.

 

The current situation

At the heart of democratizing the energy transition lies the principle of inclusivity. Historically, energy systems where one utility produced centrally with fossil fuels and distributed to different communities marginalized certain groups, such as ethnic minorities, women, or people with disabilities, leading to disparities in access to and control over energy. Even today, women belonging to ethnic minorities, such as the Dalits and Adivasis in India, are particularly at risk of spending their lives in energy poverty.

The rise of renewable energy technologies offers a unique opportunity to rectify these imbalances. The decentralization of production, thanks to the production of (clean) electricity as close as possible to where it is consumed, offers the opportunity for greater citizen participation in decision-making processes (for example, local self-consumption generally means deciding collectively where to install solar panels useful to the community). And the resulting democratization refers to the intersectional process of making sustainable energy accessible and beneficial to all members of society, regardless of socioeconomic status, gender, race, ability, or location. This approach, therefore, recognizes energy not only as a commodity but also as a fundamental right and an integral part of human dignity and social justice.

Citizen-centered energy cooperatives, one of the forms that "energy communities" can take, are an excellent example of how community-based approaches can boost the social dimension of the energy transition, combating energy poverty while fostering local engagement. In energy cooperatives, stakeholders collaborate to produce and consume all or part of the energy produced, thus becoming prosumers. Today, there are over 10,500 such cooperatives in Europe, and this figure could rise to 64 million households by 2050. The European regulatory framework now confers on energy cooperatives a relevant role in achieving the objectives of reducing energy poverty. Indeed, although these activities are characterized by an economic dimension, the primary aim of energy communities is not just to maximize economic profit but to bring environmental and social benefits to the community. Producing energy together becomes a pretext for forging social ties, offering training, encouraging local initiatives, and creating value - and this can be particularly useful in territories where jobs are limited, especially for young people and women.

 

The challenges of democratizing the energy transition

However, despite the progress made, challenges abound, particularly in terms of diversity. For example, studies show that only a tiny fraction of energy cooperative members fall into the "low-income" category. In addition, persistent disparities between persons of different genders and social roles hinder women's participation in decision-making processes. These structural inequalities mean that not all communities have the same access to renewable energy technologies or the capital to invest in them. This further widens the gap between people from affluent and marginalized communities, leaving them increasingly at risk of becoming trapped in energy poverty. This lack of diversity, therefore, represents a formidable challenge to tackling energy poverty in a comprehensive way.

According to the latest IEA-IRENA-World Bank-WHO report on the follow-up to SDG 7, which focuses on universal access to energy by 2030, in 2021, 675 million people had no access to electricity. This figure has almost halved from 1.1 billion in 2010. Yet the battle against energy poverty is not just about providing access to energy, but also ensuring that it is affordable, reliable, and sustainable for all communities. In Europe, 10% of the population faces energy poverty not because of a lack of energy supply, but because of the cost of energy, due in particular to poor-quality housing. In addition, a figure that often goes unnoticed from a Western perspective is the lack of access to clean cooking solutions. In 2021, 2.3 billion people were without such access. Most people who use polluting fuels for cooking are women and children living in disadvantaged communities, putting them at greater risk of respiratory illness and poisoning. According to the WHO, domestic air pollution caused by the use of fossil fuels for cooking is responsible for 3.2 million premature deaths a year.

Finally, existing energy systems continue to be dominated by large corporations and non-transparent central government entities, creating barriers to community-led initiatives. These institutional structures can perpetuate inequalities and hinder the adoption of more democratic, decentralized energy models.

In short, without targeted and well-funded programs, energy decarbonization strategies risk widening the gap between those who can afford to design, adopt, and invest in sustainable energy solutions and alternative technologies and those who cannot.

 

Promising  practices

In advancing the democratization of the energy transition, certain good practices emerge as beacons of progress - despite the challenge that no single model is universally applicable due to inherently different practical, structural, and cultural starting points.

Empowering local energy communities is a fundamental strategy in this transition, notably through individual and collective self-consumption. This approach, notably through energy communities and cooperatives, enables the collective production, consumption, and sharing of energy, opening up the potential for equitable distribution of the benefits of the transition. This approach champions localized solutions tailored to communities' specific needs and resources, deepening inclusion and equity. Such models also reduce reliance on traditional power hierarchies, paving the way for a more resilient and democratic energy system.

But to be truly inclusive, these models need to be accompanied by internal governance models that support changes of a cultural nature, including within existing (energy) communities, to move beyond traditional norms. These changes can take the form of information or awareness campaigns, empowering individuals to act in an informed way, demystifying energy, and learning about their rights. In the Energ'Ethic podcast, Dr Antonia Proka of RESCOOP.EU also points out that necessary structural changes can foster inclusivity. Simple but effective measures, such as rethinking meeting times and providing childcare during assemblies, can make all the difference in enabling greater participation. These changes are particularly crucial in empowering under-represented groups, such as women and parents.

As such, these models are accompanied by multi-actor dialogues, which ensure that a diversity of voices, particularly those of women and marginalized communities, are heard. The adoption of inclusive and participatory policymaking processes is placed at the heart of this effort.

 

Conclusion

In short, democratizing the energy transition is complex but vital. It requires us to reimagine energy not just as a commodity but also as a fundamental right. By adopting feminist and intersectional perspectives and learning from best practices and ongoing challenges, we can ensure that our march towards a sustainable energy future is empowering and inclusive. Experiences and lessons learned from energy cooperatives, community initiatives, and inclusive policymaking inform our path to a more democratic and equitable energy future. By adapting policies and initiatives to these specific challenges, we ensure a truly inclusive transition to sustainable energy.

 

Marine Cornelis

Marine Cornelis

Marine Cornelis, founder of Next Energy Consumer, bridges analysis and thought leadership with actionable dissemination for businesses and projects across Europe, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America. With 15 years of experience spanning consumer protection, energy poverty, and digital transformation, she champions diversity and community empowerment. Her work act as a bridge between stakeholders, skillfully blending human, technical, and political insights to ensure that people's experiences drive the transition narrative. This vision earned her recognition as an ambassador of the European Climate Pact. Through her Energ'Ethic podcast, she shares inspiring stories driving global energy and climate progress.

Related Articles

NEWSLETTER

Don´t miss any updates!
Image

Select your language

Social Media:

Log in

Climate and Environmental Justice

We have advanced rights-based and gender-transformative transition frameworks through research that centres the lived experiences of women and marginalised communities on the frontlines of extractive energy policies, promoting climate and energy frameworks attentive to the social and care-related impacts of transition pathways. We have developed a clear vision for a gender-just transition, firmly rooted in gender and human rights norms, establishing both the legal basis and the direction for the transformative changes our planet and societies urgently need. In particular, the ‘Guiding Principles for Gender Equality and Human Rights in the Energy Transition’, a collective effort built through online consultations, an in-person workshop and multiple rounds of revision with activists, practitioners and experts from around the world, outline a transformative vision for reshaping global energy systems through a human rights and gender equality lens.

Our work recognises that the climate emergency is both an existential threat and an opportunity to reimagine societies built on social, gender, economic and environmental justice. We ground our advocacy in feminist and intersectional principles, prioritising the agency and perspectives of communities in the Global South who have contributed the least to the climate emergency yet face its most devastating consequences. Central to our approach is the understanding that energy is not merely a commodity but a fundamental human right; essential for dignity, health, education, work and the realisation of countless other rights. We challenge approaches to the energy transition that risk replicating the harmful patterns of fossil fuel extraction and, instead, advocate for transformative policies that ensure human rights and gender equality as central to building climate-resilient societies rooted in dignity, justice and planetary well-being.

What's next?

We will continue to challenge approaches that treat energy transition as merely a technical shift, instead positioning it as an opportunity to reimagine economies and societies rooted in dignity for all, with particular attention to communities in the Global South who have contributed least to the climate emergency yet are most exposed to its worst effects.

We will connect community-level evidence and the lived experiences of those on the frontlines of extractive policies to national reform and global norm-setting, breaking down silos between human rights, gender, and climate movements, and advancing a shared vision that recognises just transitions as not only fundamental to achieving climate-resilient and sustainable societies, but as transformative pathways that advance social and gender equality, redistribute power and resources equitably, and ensure that energy systems serve the public good rather than profit.

We will mainstream rights-based and genderjust transition priorities in key multilateral spaces (particularly, within the Just Transition Work Programme and the to-be-developed Just Transition Mechanism, within the UNFCCC) to guarantee that just transitions are advanced at all levels.

We will also translate our work, through strategic advocacy, into at least two concrete policy wins, whether promoted, adopted, implemented, or scaled, in priority countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Colombia, South Africa, or Kenya), ensuring these policies align with human rights standards, centre gender equality, and reflect the needs and views of affected communities.

We will build momentum for the progressive recognition of the right to sustainable energy to shift dominant narratives away from purely extractive solutions that sideline gendered impacts, community participation, and Global South perspectives.

Economic Justice and Climate Finance

Our work has transformed the global discussion on fiscal policy in a more just, emancipatory and sustainable direction. Our approach has combined both high-level, expert contributions within decisionmaking circles, with bold, impactful work on narrative change with the general public.

We have been instrumental in the inclusion of human rights as a guiding principle of the future United Nations Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, a multilateral instrument with the potential of raising approx. USD 492 billion per year in public revenues currently foregone to global tax abuse. In the process leading to the ‘Compromiso de Sevilla’ decided at FfD4, we proposed and succeeded in creating a specific human rights workstream within the Civil Society Financing for Development Mechanism, which was critical to ensure that explicit commitments on the matter were included in the negotiating outcome. In a context of cutbacks in multilateral institutions, we have amplified the capacities of technical experts, providing rigorous technical support and leveraging our influence to ensure the enactments of groundbreaking standard-setting instruments, such as the 2025 UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Statement on Fiscal Policy and Human Rights, and the first ex oficio hearing on the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights on Fiscal and Economic Policies to Address Poverty and Structural Inequality, leading to an upcoming thematic resolution on the matter. We have also bridged the silos between multilateral tax discussions and climate finance debates, promoting ambitious financing commitments to increase international and domestic resource mobilisation during COP 28, 29 and 30.

At the regional level, our engagement with fiscal cooperation platforms such as the Platform for Fiscal Cooperation of Latin America and the Caribbean (PTLAC), where we are member of its Civil Society Consultative Council, and the African Anti-IFFs Policy Tracker, for which we participated in the pilot mission in Ivory Coast together with Tax Justice Network Africa (TJNA), have been critical in cementing a growing engagement between tax administrations and ministries of finance with international legal experts, exploring actionable and transformative initiatives, such as the taxation of high-net-worth individuals, beneficial ownership registries and corporate countryby-country reports, to be implemented at the international level.

At the local level, our interventions in fiscal reform debates in Chile, Brazil, Colombia and Nigeria have contributed to shaping legislative outcomes in a more progressive, rights-compliant direction.

As for our leadership in narrative change, we have a measurable track record in delivering tailored, innovative campaigns which have decisively expanded economic justice constituencies by appealing to a broader tent. In Latin America and the Caribbean, we created the ‘Date Cuenta’ campaign, coordinating over 40 organisations across civil society to deliver plain language, innovative messaging connecting progressive fiscal reforms to the financing of health, education and social protection. ‘Date Cuenta’ generated over 55 original campaign messages that were tailored to the realities of seven priority countries (Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru and Honduras) and disseminated in Spanish, Portuguese and English. In doing so, we convened more than 65 online co-creation workshops with partners, coordinating a unified communications strategy which combined digital outreach, press and media coverage, and collaboration with influencers. Ultimately, ‘Date Cuenta’ resulted in more than 60,000 interactions on social media, coverage in major regional and international media outlets, including El País, Deutsche Welle, Bloomberg and France 24, and the participation of at least 63 social media influencers through 58 dedicated publications. In collaboration with Fundación Gabo and the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, we also organised a two-day workshop in Bogota with 20 journalists from 13 countries, building a regional network trained in a human rights-based approach to fiscal policy that has since generated published media coverage on outlets such as La Diaria, Ciper, El Diario Ar and Milenio. Through ‘Date Cuenta’ and our regional advocacy, we strengthened civil society engagement in key processes, including the Financing for Development track and FfD4, co-organised highlevel dialogues with states and civil society from Latin America and Africa.

What's next?

We will shape the UN Tax Convention and its Protocols so they embed human rights principles, and we will stay engaged through follow-up processes (including the expected Conference of the Parties) to support effective implementation. We will keep linking tax and climate finance so that new resources mobilised through fiscal cooperation are channelled to adaptation, mitigation, and loss and damage, in line with UNFCCC commitments.

Public Services for Care Societies

We have translated participatory research into accountability and policy outcomes.

In Ivory Coast, our work with Mouvement Ivoirien des Droits Humains and affected communities since 2023 exposed how privatisation and lack of accountability restrict access to quality healthcare. It contributed to the closure of 1,022 illegal private health centres, an executive instrument strengthening the regulation of private hospitals across the country, and the creation of a permanent complaints management committee in healthcare through a bylaw issued by the prefect of Gagnoa. Partners engaged through this process also advanced concrete improvements at facility level: members of the Gagnoa Midwives Association who took part in the participatory action research pooled resources to renovate the neonatal unit of the Regional Hospital, and the Director of the Gagnoa General Hospital launched an action plan to expand services and improve patient reception, with the facility receiving the award for best hospital in the country in 2025.

In Kenya, our research with the Mathare Education Taskforce documented the absence of public schools and the expansion of private provision, evidencing impacts on households and caregivers and strengthening demands for free, quality public education. This work contributed to stronger community agency and collective organisation, alongside ongoing strategies ranging from communications to litigation to secure a public school in the area, some involving GI-ESCR and others led independently.

Across Africa, this work is complemented by a multi-country study examining the human rights implications of austerity in education and health, including how regressive fiscal policies, rising debt burdens and persistent underinvestment undermine the financing and delivery of public services.

In Latin America, from 29 November to 2 December 2021, over a thousand representatives from over one hundred countries, from grassroots movements, advocacy, human rights, and development organisations, feminist movements, trade unions, and other civil society organisations, met in Santiago, Chile, and virtually, to discuss the critical role of public services for our future. Following the meeting, the Santiago Declaration on Public Services was adopted to demand universal access to quality, gender-transformative and equitable public services as the foundation of a fair and just society.

We are currently advancing work on care systems, linking public services and fiscal justice through integrated research, advocacy and communications, including a regional campaign framing care as a collective responsibility requiring sustained public investment.

What's next?

In Ivory Coast, we will evaluate and strengthen the complaints management committee and position it as a replicable model for other health facilities. In Kenya, we will support the Mathare community to co-design a model public school for Mabatini and Ngei wards, grounded in human rights standards. Building on our multi-country austerity study, we will drive national advocacy on financing for education and health: advancing reforms in Ghana; launching a fiscal policy and public services financing agenda in Kenya through the CESCR process and targeted coalition work; and, in Nigeria, using the new tax acts in force since 1 January 2026 to catalyse a national accountability campaign for adequately funded, quality public services. In Latin America, we will amplify locally led care pilots across 8 countries and turn lessons into influence—advancing care policies that strengthen care organisations, protect care workers’ rights, support unpaid caregivers, include disability and family networks, and redistribute care more equitably.